Friday, June 21, 2013

Instagram gets video

from cnet


Instagram gets video
Scroll RightScroll Left
  • Instagram gets video
  • Yahoo's Flickr in 2008
  • 12Seconds in 2008
  • Gnzo in 2010
  • Tout in 2011
  • Vlix in 2011
  • SocialCam in 2011
  • Viddy in 2011
  • Klip in 2011
  • Recood in 2011
  • Keek in 2011
  • Vloggo in 2012
  • Cinemagram in 2012
  • Ecograph in 2012
  • Lightt in 2012
  • Vigi
  • Vine in 2013
Instagram on Thursday introduced video, a much rumored feature that lets users shoot brief clips that can be shared just like photos.
The Facebook-owned service is not the first to take a crack at the concept, though there's been a ton of variation, and some early efforts date all the way back to 2008.
Click through to hear about 16 companies that have ventured into short video, and what happened to them.
    June 20, 2013 3:30 PM PDT
    Photo by: Instagram
    | Caption by: Josh Lowensohn

    Instagram vs. Vine: Top five differences

    from washington post




    Instagram (and Facebook) threw down against Vine (and Twitter) this week, after debuting a new video mode for its network. But while they look and operate in much the same manner, there are plenty of key differences to set these two products apart.
    Here’s a look at some of the biggest ways the apps diverge:
    Multimedia
    Naval Research Lab Team at Cape Canaveral for spin test of GRAB1 atop Transit 2A. (Left to right) Martin J. Votaw, George G. Kronmiller, Alfred R. Conover and Roy A. Harding. Image from NSA/CSS 60th Anniversary Timeline, 1960s. (NSA.gov)

    A history of the NSA

    The agency was home to secretive intelligence gathering, technological breakthroughs and even beauty pageants.
    More tech stories

    Instagram vs. Vine: Top five differences

    Instagram vs. Vine: Top five differences
    Yes, Instagram’s videos are longer. But that’s not the only way these two diverge.

    Scottish startup thinks whiskey can fuel more than an epic bender

    Scottish startup thinks whiskey can fuel more than an epic bender
    The Scottish malt whiskey industry currently disposes of 90 percent of the liquid it produces because it is undrinkable, and a startup wants to change that.

    Instagram’s video move is a ‘mistake,’ says social video pioneer

    Instagram’s video move is a ‘mistake,’ says social video pioneer
    Sol Lipman, who knows social video services better than most entrepreneurs, explains why the move is a mistake.
    Length: The biggest distinguishing factor between these two services is the amount of time they allow for clips. Instagram offers users 15 seconds to Vine’s six — two-and-a-half times the video fun. The longer time-limit is supposed to make it easier for more people to shoot videos, since you don’t have to ration your time quite as jealously as you do with Vine.
    More time is not always a good thing. If you have something really fun to film, then it gives you a lot of room to run. But if the video’s boring, fifteen seconds can seem like a lifetime. (At least a waste of time.)
    But asking people to take more time to watch your content means there could actually be a higher bar for what makes a good video on Instagram — or at least a lower tolerance threshold for subpar work.
    Shooting: Shooting on the two apps is similar, but not identical. On Vine, you can hold your finger down anywhere on the screen to start recording. With Instagram, you have to hit a dedicated button on the screen. It’s big and red, but it’s still not quite as easy to use when shooting.
    The trade-off, however, is that Instagram lets you tap-to-focus in the midst of your shooting, opening up the intriguing possibility of switching the action from background to foreground and vice-versa.
    Instagram also includes a nifty feature that lets you stabilize your video after you shoot it — again, a feature that makes sense when dealing with longer clips.
    Editing: Instagram brings two new additions to the editing table that Vine doesn’t have — the ability to delete and the option to add one of its signature filters to your videos.
    Being able to delete is a good touch, particularly if Instagram is looking for a more thoughtful phone video crowd. And filters can cover up a multitude of lighting and shooting sins, even if they can’t make your video any more entertaining.
    Not to be outdone, Vine may be looking to deal with bloopers in the future as well. Ahead of Facebook’s announcement, Vine released a short video of a phone running a version of Vine that apparently can save drafts — a hint of what may be coming in the future.
    Looping: Vine’s looping is one of its most unique features, tapping into the .gif-sharing culture and providing a good platform for animation. You wouldn’t want videos much longer than six seconds to play on repeat, so it makes sense that Instagram didn’t follow suit with a similar format.
    Still, there’s something charming about the loop. The best Vines actually improve on their second or third rewatch, and there’s certainly a thoughtful crowd out there that takes pride in making clips that flow well from beginning to end.
    Instagram videos, on the other hand, require users to be thoughtful in a more traditional way — basically, making sure that what they’re posting is worth the time to watch it.
    Convenience: Instagram’s video comes as a mode within the existing app, while Vine stands alone. It’s a smart move for Instagram, given that it means they already have a video app with 130 million monthly users.
    That could be the result of the lesson Facebook learned from its self-destructing Poke video app, a separate app that has failed to pick up many users. On the other hand, having a stand-alone app means that you’re fewer taps away from making a quick video in the moment.
    (Washington Post Co. chairman and chief executive Donald E. Graham is a member of Facebook’s board of directors.)
    Sign up today to receive #thecircuit, a daily roundup of the latest tech policy news from Washington and how it is shaping business, entertainment and science.

    Instagram vs. Vine: Battle of the short-form video-sharing apps

    from cnet


    Wondering how Instagram's new video capabilities stack up against Vine's? The answer is pretty clear.



    Jaymar Cabebe

    by  

    Hey, guys, remember Vine? That's what we might be asking each other if this whole video-on-Instagram thing pans out.
    If you haven't heard, Instagram today announced the addition of video capturing and sharing capabilities to its widely used photo app. The new features are now available on both Androidand iOS, and so far, users seem to be really excited about the moving pictures.
    But how exactly do Instagram's new features stack up against Twitter's video-sharing baby? While Instagram's update may have borrowed copiously from the Vine (also available for iOSand Android) experience, the two apps do differ greatly. Below, we'll break down some of the biggest differences and see who comes out on top.

    Shooting video

    Vine's recording interface is as simple as it gets, with the only onscreen elements being a video viewer, a timeline, and a button to swap between rear- and front-facing cameras. To start recording, all you have to do is tap and hold anywhere onscreen, and you can do so as many times as you need to in order to fill up the 6-second time window with clips. Bad thing is, if you make a mistake somewhere in the middle of your recording, you'll have to start over again. Once you're done, you get one last preview before moving forward to share your 6-second (or less) work of art.
    Vine (left) gives you 6 seconds while Instagram (right) gives you 15 seconds. But also worth mentioning is that the latter lets you adjust focus and exposure while recording.
    (Credit: Screenshot by Jaymar Cabebe/CNET)
    Taking a page out of Vine's book, Instagram also employed the clever tap-and-hold recording scheme to benefit its users. The biggest difference, though, is that you can't tap just anywhere onscreen to start recording; you have to tap the camera button on the bottom. That's because tapping on Instagram's video viewer adjusts focus and exposure, which is a good thing. A really good thing. While Vine's camera might not do well under bad lighting conditions, Instagram's at least gives you some assistance with the built-in tap-to-adjust tool. Oh, and Instagram can switch between rear- and front-facing cameras too, so no need to worry about that.
    The other thing that sets Instagram apart, of course, is that it gives you more than double the recording time. Similarly to Tout, another social video app, Instagram gives you a full 15 seconds.
    What's more, Instagram lets you go back and delete the last clip in your timeline if you make a mistake, and you can do this as many times as you need to. Winner: Instagram (by far)

    Processing and sharing

    Once you're done shooting with Vine, the app gives you one last preview, then shoots you off to the Share screen, where you can add your caption, tag a location, and post your video to Vine, Twitter, and Facebook. When you're done, the app takes just a few seconds to process the video, then conveniently saves a copy to your camera roll before sharing. It's important to note that if you don't want to share your video, Vine doesn't force you to (Instagram does). You can actually uncheck all three sharing options, then keep your 6-second, multiclip piece to yourself. But remember, if you do so, you won't be able to later import the video back into Vine.
    The two apps have similar sharing capabilities, but Instagram (right) lets you add filters and apply an image stabilizer before posting.
    (Credit: Screenshot by Jaymar Cabebe/CNET)
    The big kicker with Instagram is that it gives you 13 filters to treat your video with once you're done recording. Similar to the app's photo filters, Instagram's video filters can alter the colors and saturation of your work to give it that vintage or otherwise artsy look. What's more, Instagram comes with a built-in video stabilizer called Cinema that you can apply to your entire video before posting. And finally, the app lets you add a caption, choose a cover frame, post to your Photo Map, and share on Facebook, Twitter, e-mail, Tumblr, and Foursquare. And just like Vine, Instagram saves a copy of the video in your cmera roll. Winner: Instagram (by a mile)

    The Timeline

    Take a scroll through your timelines in both Vine and Instagram, and you'll notice that they are similar in many ways. They both automatically load and play videos as you scroll by them, and there are buttons to Like and add comments to any of the items you come across. These basics are the same, but there are a number of key differences that set the two platforms apart.
    With Vine, videos on the Timeline continuously loop, giving users some extra room to create seemingly endless pieces of art.
    On the Timeline, Vine (left) plays videos endlessly in a loop while Instagram (right) stops upon completion.
    (Credit: Screenshot by Jaymar Cabebe/CNET)
    Meanwhile, Instagram videos just play to completion and stop, which isn't necessarily a bad thing, but will certainly be disappointing to many. The biggest difference, though, is that Instagram's Timeline also includes static photographs. Whether or not users would prefer to have a separate timeline just for videos, it's still early to tell. Winner: Vine

    Discovering videos

    Without a doubt, Vine makes it easy to discover new videos. Its Explore screen includes Editor's Picks, popular videos, and trending hashtags. You can click on any option and find see thousands of new videos to satisfy your appetite.
    Vine's Explore screen (left) makes it easy to discover interesting videos. Meanwhile, Instagram's (right) mixes in still photos, which can make it more difficult.
    (Credit: Screenshot by Jaymar Cabebe/CNET)
    Instagram, on the other hand, makes it a bit more difficult. As of now, there's no way to filter video content from static photos, so Instagram's Explore screen might not be as helpful as Vine's. You can try searching for the hashtag "#video" but there's still no guarantee that you'll filter out the stills. Winner: Vine

    Winner: Instagram

    Sure, each app won two categories apiece, but the reality is that Instagram dominated its categories. And to be frank, those categories that Instagram won in (shooting and sharing) are significantly more important. With Instagram's video filters, longer time limit, exposure tool, and image stabilizer, Vine is going to have to seriously step up its game if it hopes to continue to increase its user base.

    Thursday, June 20, 2013

    Nvidia Cuts Shield Game Console Price to $299 from $349; Available June 27

    from wsj



    By Melodie Warner 
     
    Nvidia Corp. (NVDA) slashed the price of its Android-based game console Shield to $299 from $349, just ahead of its launch, in an effort to attract more gamers.
    The company joined Microsoft Corp. (MSFT) this week in making a significant change between the original unveiling of its new videogame device and the launch in order to make it more attractive to consumers.
    For its part, Nvidia is best known for making chips and circuit boards that help computers and videogame consoles generate visual effects. Over the years, the company has expanded into making chips for mobile devices and first announced its Project Shield effort in January.
    The console, which is available June 27, is powered by Nvidia's Tegra 4 chip and features a five-inch, high-definition multitouch display, speakers, Wi-Fi and the Jelly Bean flavor of Android. It also has 16 gigabytes of memory, GPS, Bluetooth, HDMI output, microSD storage slot and a headphone jack.
    "We've heard from thousands of gamers that if the price was $299, we'd have a home run," said Jason Paul, product line manager of GeForce GPUs in a blog post Thursday.
    Those who pre-ordered the Shield will be charged the new, lower price when the product ships.
    Microsoft, meanwhile, said Wednesday it would reverse some unpopular policies it recently announced for its coming Xbox One videogame console. The company said it would no longer require its Xbox to connect to the Internet each day, nor would it restrict how its videogame discs are traded, resold or rented.
    Nvidia reported last month its fiscal first-quarter earnings rose 29% as revenue climbed 3.2% and margins improved.
    
    
    -Ina Fried contributed to this report.
    
    
    Write to Melodie Warner at melodie.warner@dowjones.com